An exclusive presentation about Jewish terrorism in Palestine during the British mandate era (1920-1948).
This video focuses on the deadly King David Hotel bombing (July 22nd 1946) and makes the case that British Zionists (e.g. Douglas Murray, Col. Richard Kemp et al) are traitors: Enemies within; who must be interned without trial until the illegitimate state of Israel is dismantled, and Palestine restored to her original borders.
Our video opens with a clip from Peter Kominsky’s excellent mini-series The Promise, which is one of the best dramas of the decade; and I urge you to watch it if you haven’t already.
You’ll then see archive footage from Pathe and Movietone News broadcasts about the King David Hotel attack.
Followed by clips from a Zionist rally with Israeli propagandists Douglas Murray and Col. Richard Kemp (please excuse the poor video quality of Kemp’s clip, it was obviously filmed on a phone).
We stay focused on Col. Kemp’s philosemitic fawning, and follow him on a subservience trip to the illegitimate state of Israel (badmouthing his own country whilst offering his services as a Shabbos Goy).
The penultimate clip features an important admission from the Colonel (during an interview with Sky News Australia), in which he confesses to working with the Israeli Mossad: Kemp doesn’t specify in what capacity, so we can only speculate as to the nature of his treasonous collaboration with a foreign intelligence service that’s been implicated in every major terrorist attack from 9/11, to Madrid to 7/7.
We end with Col. Kemp advocating internment for terror suspects in Britain, and Forward March suggesting that Israeli sympathisers should be the first suspects interned under any such law.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) was a smarmy stooge for the Rothschild controlled, British Empire: Mirza, a Judeo-Caabalist Freemason, collaborated with the invaders and conspired against his own countrymen.
This chap was also a bit of an egomaniac; and quickly established (with Rothschild help, of course) a religious cult / movement based around himself (i.e. Ahmadiyya), inducted disciples and propagandised for the British Empire’s wars in India, Afghanistan and around the world.
Some might describe Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, as the Majid Nawaz of the 19th century.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908): False Prophet, fake Messiah. Founder of the Ahamdiyya sect, feudal lord, author, lackey for the British Empire, cult leader.
“My father was a well-known landlord in this country (India) and he enjoyed great eminence in the (British Empire’s) Government’s offices. He was a true devotee and well wisher of the British Government. In the mutiny of 1857, my father supplied fifty horses and riders to aid the British Government. For this favour to the Government, he was very popular among the (colonial) officials.”
Izala-e-Auham, P. 58, Mirza Ghulam, 1890
Note that Mirza Ghulam uses the occupier’s term—i.e. ‘Mutiny of 1857’—instead of the indigenous term—i.e. The First War of Independence, 1857.
“This story of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is an economic one and it started indirectly as the USA was created: In the late 1700s the Brits lost the Americas to the new settlers who complained about taxation without representation. Similarly, the Brits were taxing Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs in the Indian subcontinent: They basically confiscated all the taxable land and resources of India, then made Indians pay tax on their earnings. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his family swooped in and were able to get land grants and good jobs because of their attitude towards their own people. Any invading force is always looking for traitors, and the Mirzas stood up to help them.”
Taken from Macaulay’s address to Parliament, February 1835, and from his essay on Clive (1840).
Mirza, not content with being a garden variety Uncle Tom, went onto claim that he was the Messiah (Mahdi) and a Prophet: And if Muslims didn’t surrender to the English, they were disobeying God.
Needless to say, this quaint combination of self-aggrandising blasphemy and British boot-licking, didn’t sit too well with serious people. When the Brit’s realised Mirza’s messiah routine wasn’t working, he was ordered to start threatening anyone who resisted:
“The Amir’s (of Kabul) citizens will surely suffer if he fails to pay heed to this essential reform”.
‘The British and Jihad’, p.22, Mirza Ghulam, 1900
No one listened to him. And the Afghans went onto beat the British Empire in the third Anglo-Afghan war (1919).
The Rothschild controlled British Empire, didn’t bother to protect its Ahmadiyya sidekicks from Afghan reprisals in 1919: The Ahmadis were useful idiots for the empire, but wholly expendable in the event of a military retreat.
Qadiani collaborators fled Afghanistan in defeat & disgrace, some were captured and executed; and that’s still a raw nerve for them today. Understandably so, given that their Rothschild overlords took such a monumental beating at the hands of the Afghan Mujaheddin: who, on paper, shouldn’t have won that war at all. The Ahmadiyya maintain that they were run out of Afghanistan in a wave of religious persecution, though I suspect their criminal activities in aiding & abetting an imperial occupation force, may have had something to do with it as well.
MIRZA GHULAM: SHABBOS GOY FOR HIRE
Now say what you will about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, but no one could stop Mirza from doing what he did best—i.e. sucking up to the Judeo-British Empire—I mean, really; there’s sucking up, then there’s shameless self-abasement, and then there’s the obsequious Uncle Tommery of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
But all his grovelling kind of paid off, because Rothschild kept Mirza on the payroll— primarily because no one else was prepared to stoop to such lows for a few Pounds and Rupees.
The Judeo-British Empire wanted the Ahmadiyya group to dilute Islam in some way and, in particular, portray Jihad (in this case–regional resistance against Judeo-British occupation) in a negative light. They also believed that the Ahamadiyya could be instrumental in their long-term plan to rewrite history (as per the aims of Macaulay), and pacify Muslim opposition to Judeo-British rule.
Zionist Jewry’s ultimate objective, was to remove the concept of Jihad from the Muslim vocabulary: Obviously, the invaders wanted to avoid any future uprisings like the First War of Independence (1857) or the Anglo-Afghan wars. And thought the best way of doing this; would be to create, finance & mobilise a cult that wore the garb of Islam, but was actually as alien and hostile to Muslims, as the Judeo-British Empire itself.
Mirza’s influence with the Rothschilds waned in sync with the Empire’s international disintegration towards the turn of the 19th century. But given that this was his main source of income; Mirza persisted with the scam for the sake his livelihood.
“The majority of people who have joined my sect are those who are either holding eminent posts with the British Court, or the goodly rich men, their servants and friends or businessmen, lawyers or those educated in the modern way or such famous scholars, servants and noblemen who have either served the British Government in the past or are serving it at present…In short, this is a party which is the protege of the British Government from whom it has earned good name and who is worthy of the Government’s favors. Or it consists of people who are related to me or are among my servants.”
“I have filled shelves with books which I wrote in praise of the British, especially about the abrogation of Jihad in which many Muslims believe. This is a big service to the Government. So I hope for an appropriate and good reward.”
Some folks say he recanted on his deathbed, but Mirza’s successors; all self-styled ‘Caliphs’, claim that he neither affirmed nor rejected the Ahmadiyya doctrine. Keeping it nice and vague, then: Good business acumen there: A little bit of nothing for everyone.
THE AHMADIYYA-ISRAELI CONNECTION
From a modern day perspective, pro-Palestinian people don’t trust Ahmadis because of their leadership’s links with the illegitimate state of Israel. Ahmadis tend to hide behind religion and play the human rights card in the West, instead of just presenting themselves as a Zionist political group, which is what they’ve always been.
DIRECT-DEBIT, CASH OR CREDIT CARD?
Ahmadi ‘Caliph’, His High Holy Loveliness; Mirza Masroor Ahmad, with pro-Israeli U.S. senator, Bob Casey, in Washington.
The Ahmadiyya are accused of extorting money from their hapless followers: A former Ahmadi debt collector, describes how the system is set up: And the ruthless manner in which the most vulnerable Ahmadis are coerced into paying tribute to the ‘Caliph’…
“They take money from the poor, the sick and the old. It’s so breathtakingly wrong, that you almost can’t believe your eyes. Other than the rank-and-file Ahmadi knowing about the reality of the situation, there is also a plainly visible chanda calculator. The gall of this is breathtaking…”
“The Qadiani Ahmadiyya collect money from the poorest of their poor at the prescribed rates, which combined, total to about at least 8.25% (6.25% + 1% + 1%) of net income. Not even welfare and unemployment benefits are exempt.”
So bear that in mind, ladies and gentlemen; for we should’t judge regular Ahmadis too harshly, because its not entirely their fault: They’ve either been attached to the group by proxy (e.g. maybe their parents are members, and they’ve been roped into it that way), or they just haven’t read the small-print before singing up: Ahmadis are people like everyone else; and each individual must eventually choose their own path: And the only way they can do that, is by having access to all the facts required to make an informed decision.
MESSIAH COMPLEX?–GET IN LINE, MIRZA
The Ahmadiyya enterprise was shipped back to England in 1926.
Today, anti-Muslim groups claim that there are 4 million + Ahmadis in the world, but other sources put the figure at less than a million and falling. It really depends on who you ask.
But the reason they’ve been in the news as of late; is due to a controversial, albeit unintentionally hilarious, advertising campaign in Britain…
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) have received a number of complaints about these propaganda posters. Citing the fact that the Ahmadi interpretation of Islam, isn’t in line with The Holy Qu’ran, and historically hostile towards the core principals of the Muslim faith.
The complaints were said to be focused around the following three points:
The billboard incites hatred, is deeply offensive and hurtful to millions of British citizens.
Misleading because what they (Ahmadis) believe is not consistent with the teachings of the Holy Qu’ran.
The Ahmadi claim to represent True Islam, doesn’t take into the consideration the beliefs of some 2 billion Muslims who don’t subscribe to their doctrine. This puts the Ahmadi leadership at risk of being indicted on a False Representation Charge, under Sections 2, 3, 4 and 6 of the Fraud Act (2006).
“The (Ahmadiyya) campaign has prompted outrage from Christians, Muslims and Jews who all have notions of a ‘messiah’ in their beliefs and find the billboards offensive.”
Advertising Standards Authority assesses dozens of complaints over ‘Messiah has come’ billboards, Harry Farley, 19 Feb 2018, Christian Today
That’s a good thing, surely? Don’t the Ahmadi ‘Caliphs’ always go on about ‘Love for All, Hate for None’? Well now’s the time for them to show us that wasn’t just a cheap slogan. Isn’t this what they claimed they were all about: Bringing people of different faiths together? Well its happened. And it was the Ahmadiyya themselves who made it possible. Who knows, maybe Mirza Ghulam repented after all. Allah (SWT) knows best.
Forward March 