Remember the Rohingya: China’s Peace Plan Annoys Western Warmongers

By Kashif Ahmed

With all that’s been going on lately,  the Rohingya crisis hasn’t been in the news as much as it was 3-4 months ago: But Rohingya Muslims are still being hounded out of their own country by pro-Israeli ‘Buddhists’ and racist factions of the Tatmadow armed forces.

Those who manage to escape the violence in Myanmar; face the prospect of being killed by the Israeli controlled, Hindutva government in India, processed in Australia’s dehumanising detention centres, or ruthlessly exploited in the squalor of the Kutupalong refugee camp, Bangladesh.

 

Rohingya Vision TV (RVision) covers Rohingya news, documentaries, and cultural programs in Rohingya, Burmese, English and Arabic. RVision is based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

But there is the faintest glimmer of hope amidst this fog of despair: A guiding beacon from Beijing, not in the form of arms or aid or even advocacy. But in the guise of an undeniable fact, a glimpse into the future; and a clear sign for Myanmar to pay heed to the regional reality that is the People’s Republic of China, and fall into line.

Image result for one belt one road

China’s One Belt-One Road (New Silk Road) Initiative.

WHO ARE THE ROHINGYA PEOPLE AND WHY ARE THEY BEING DRIVEN OUT?

Rohingya National Identity Card, issued by the Myanmar (Burma) government in 1952: Rohingya Muslims have been living and working in Burma since the 16th century. They became citizens of Myanmar (Burma) after independence from Judeo-British rule. But their citizenship was revoked in 1982; which rendered them stateless, and vulnerable to attacks from government forces and pro-Israeli ‘Buddhist’ gangs.

 

Image result for rohingya historical photo

Image result for rohingya 1978

Four Years before Rohingya rights were officially revoked via the ‘Citizenship Law’.

 

ACTIVE INSURGENCIES IN MYANMAR

 

A few of these groups have the numbers (e.g. Karen National Liberation Army has 4,000 members), but the majority are small bands of approx 60-100 locals each (e.g. the Arakan Liberation Army sounds quite impressive, but only has between 60-100 members).

Rakhine, Kachin, Kayin, Myawaddy Township and Shan State Insurgencies:

  • Arakan Army
  • Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army
  • Kachin Independence Army
  • Shanni Nationalities Army
  • Ta’ang National Liberation Army
  • Democratic Karen Buddhist Army – Brigade 5
    (ceasefire since 2015)
  • Arakan Liberation Army (ceasefire since 2015)
  • Karen National Defence Organisation (ceasefire since 2015)
  • Karen National Liberation Army (ceasefire since 2015)

Chin State, Magway and Sagaing Region Insurgencies:

  • Kuki National Army
  • Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army
  • Zomi Revolutionary Army
  • Chin National Army (ceasefire since 2015)

Personally, I think the real reasons as to why the Rohingya have been targeted over the years; is that they don’t have a very powerful militia, because Rakhine is lucrative land and because Shabbos Goys in the Myanmar government sporadically attempt to implement an anti-Muslim agenda.

The question is: How long should we tolerate the petty, destructive mindset of a handful of backward, pro-Israeli politicos? Should all of South East Asia be held back because of a few crooks? No. That simply won’t do.

WHO WANTS WHAT

Now Myanmar has a well-hidden, but deeply Judaized, pro-Israeli political framework– They’ve even had Jewish mayors in Rangoon and Pathein (remember, this is a state where non-Burmese are routinely treated like second-class citizens). So whilst the Israeli controlled, U.S-Indian-Bangladeshi governments; are trying to spin the Rohingya crisis to suit their political agenda against China. Rothschild’s Shabbos Goys in Naypyidaw; are also playing an inherently treasonous, profoundly stupid and inevitably dangerous double game. But there are some sane, forward-thinking patriots in Naypyidaw as well; people who see the impending realignment of power, and want Myanmar to be a prosperous, progressive and peaceful state.

Putting all these convoluted machinations to one side for a second, bottom line: Rohingya Muslims are in a bit of a fix. And somehow, without playing into enemy hands, we have to help them out.

Its a bit like Yugoslavia in that respect; Zionist Jewry were supporting the Serbs on the ground (because of a shared anti-Muslim agenda), but propagandising against them in the media (becasue Zionists also wanted to balkanize the country).

Similarly in Myanmar; the Western media are shedding crocodile tears for the Rohingya, but all Zionist governments are tacitly encouraging Myanmar to exacerbate the crisis; and get Syu Kyi loyalists onto the U.S.-Israeli-Indian side of the port development projects scheme.

On the other hand, China (who’ve invested a lot of working capital to develop Myanmar for the New Silk Road) wants to use high-end, strategic diplomacy to ensure Myanmar makes the right decision.

Myanmar appears to have two options now:

  1. Accept the fact that the Rohingya have been living and working in Burma since the 16th century: Revoke the racist, 1982 Citizenship Law (which stripped Rohingya’s of their nationality), work with China,  switch the economy over to AIIB / Yuan transactions. And move forward as an important, independent South-East Asian state.
  2. Remain in the 19th century under the usury based, Judeo-Western capitalist system (i.e. Rothschild’s fractional reserve banking scam). And continue to fight an endless array of ethnic-sectarian conflcits with your own people.

WHAT THE ENEMY WANTS:

  • Incite Muslims against China (which is a pro-Palestine and pro-Kashmir country).
  • Derail or delay China’s New Silk Road (One Belt-One Road Initiative), Kyauk Phyu deep seaport project and SEZ (special economic zone) in Rakhine.
  • Activate Israeli-Indian assets within Myanmar to commit another round of false flag terror attacks against Chinese projects.
  • Control Myanmar’s economy  via the Rothschild central bank (a process instigated  by former president, Thein Sein from 2011-14).

WHAT THE ALLIES WANT:

  • Restoration of civil rights for Rohingya people, recognition in law for their status as citizens.
  • Economic development in Rakhine in accordance with the Chinese Peace Plan and SEZ proposal.
  • Timely completion of the New Silk Road (One Belt-One Road Initiative), Kyauk Phyu deep seaport project and the unhindered implementation of an SEZ (special economic zone) in Rakhine.
  • Punitive action against Israeli-Indian allied terrorist groups (e.g. Ashin Wirathu’s 969) and other criminals.

WHAT SOME ROHINGYAS WANT:

Rohingya refugee leaders issue demands before repatriation, South China Morning Post, 19th January, 2018

“Half a dozen Rohingya elders, saying they represented 40 villages from Rakhine State, showed the list of demands to a reporter at Kutupalong refugee camp (Bangladesh), where most of the 655,500 Rohingya refugees are staying.”

1. Keep UN Security Force in ARAKAN before Repatriation.
2. Restore nationality with Rohingya Ethnicity.
3. Bangladesh, UN EU, UNHCR, OIC, HRW, USA, UK, Other International Communities and Rohingya Representative must involve in Repatriation Agreement and process.
4. Rehabilitate in own Land, Village and House, Compound.
5.Compensate our losses and return back confiscated Lands
6. To ensure freedom of religion and movement
7. No accusation on any Rohingya about past event.
9. Take action to the criminals in ICC Court.
10 Government staff from Rohingya Refugees must be continued in previous service, not to take take action.
11. All of our demands must be ensured and affected to all in IDP members in Sittwe and others before repatriation.
12. Stop new IDP camp construction and close up previous IDP camp in Sittwe and others.

CHINA’S PEACE PLAN

Wary world watches as China plays peacemaker

By Goh Sui Noi
China Bureau Chief, The Straits Times
JAN 1, 2018, 5:00 AM SGT

“Earlier in November, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi proposed a three-step approach to resolve the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar. This included allowing the return of the over 600,000 Rohingya who had fled violence against them to Bangladesh and economic development of the impoverished Rakhine state to solve the underlying problems that led to the violence.”

China’s three point peace plan is a good way forward and, if implemented correctly, could be the solution we’ve all been hoping for:

Chinese Foreign Minister, Wang Yi’s Three Point Peace Plan:

Image result for Minister Wang Yi rohingya

China’s Foreign Minister, Wang Yi (L) meets Myanmar President, Htin Kyaw in Naypyidaw, November 2017

  1. Have a ceasefire: Restore order and stability, so Rohingya people can live in peace.

  2. All parties should encourage and support Myanmar and Bangladesh to strengthen Rohingya refugee exchanges. Find a way to solve this issue through consultation on the basis of equality.

  3. Economic development of Rakhine State.

“I think China will first offer financial aid to people in the area to help their lives there, while at the same time use diplomacy to try to convince Bangladesh to stop deporting Rohingya refugees. It will also try to persuade Myanmar’s government to acknowledge the identity of the Rohingya people as its citizens. This won’t be easy.”

Image result for Dr. Hu Zhiyong Fox
Dr. Hu Zhiyong Fox, a research fellow at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences’ Institute of International Relations,

China lays out three-point plan to ease Rohingya crisis, Beijing on more proactive tack in the region with offer to Bangladesh and Myanmar, observers say.

20th November 2017, South China Morning Post

THE SITUATION TODAY

Related image

Pro-Rohingya protesters in Indonesia.

Myanmar: ‘Bodies half-buried, faces burned with acid’, Feb 1, 2018, Press TV

“The Associated Press (AP) has confirmed the discovery of more than five new mass graves in Rohingya Muslim villages in Myanmar where the military and Buddhist mobs have been running amok in a campaign of death and destruction against minority Muslims…the massacres had taken place in the village of Gu Dar Pyin, in Buthidaung Township in Myanmar’s Rakhine State. AP, citing survivors, said Myanmar’s military had launched multiple deadly attacks on the village last August “with help from Buddhist neighbors.”

In a vivid description of the violence perpetrated against the Muslim minority group, the news agency said the mass graves, all previously unreported, kept corpses of men half-buried, with their faces burned away by acid or blasted by bullets.

Myanmar brands the minority Rohingya Muslims in the country as “illegal immigrants” from Bangladesh, refusing to accept them as citizens despite the fact that they have lived in the country for many generations. Bangladesh, too, denies the Rohingya citizenship and has threatened to cut their food rations if they refuse to leave.

Bangladesh and Myanmar recently finalized an agreement that would facilitate the repatriation of the Rohingya refugees over the next two years. But the refugees have expressed serious concern about their safety back in Myanmar.

For the record, Myanmar denies these reports; and says that the Inn Din incident (where villagers and military personal murdered 10 Rohingya people, and buried them in a mass-grave that they had been ordered to dig at gunpoint) is the only crime under investigation by Tatmadow personnel.

Tatmadow investigation report, Inn Din Incident, 10.1.18:

“Action will be taken against the villagers … and the security force members who violated the rules of engagement according to the law. Action would also be taken against those who had failed to report the incident to their seniors, and those responsible for supervising the operation”.

Lieutenant General Aye Win

Do I trust this investigation? Not at all. Am I prepared to give Lt. General Win the benefit of the doubt?…it pains me to say it; but yes, we should see if he’s sincere about making these people accountable for their crimes.

The first 450 of 600,000 Rohingya refugees in Kutupalong,  Bangladesh; were scheduled to return to Rakhine on January 22nd, 2018. That hasn’t happened for obvious reasons, and now it appears as if we’re all just looking at each other, as if to say: ‘Well now what?’

The solution is for everyone to be made to follow the Chinese peace plan, and consider the amendments we’ve added to that plan (detailed below under the subtitle: NEW PROPOSED PLAN: THE 11-POINT CHINA-MYANMAR-ROHINGYA PEACE PLAN).

Malaysia and other like-minded NAM-ASEAN countries, must continue to support Rohingya Muslims, and robustly persuade Myanmar’s government to do the right thing: If diplomatic efforts fail, or the peace plan is stalled by pro-U.S.-Israeli-Indian factions within Myanmar, then the allies will have no choice but to redress the balance in a more forceful manner.

For Myanmar is no stranger to insurgences, and viably adding the Rohingya to that list, is no big deal. But why should any non-separatist ethnic group, have to take up arms just to be recognised? Why would any serious government want them to do that, surely the value of whatever treasures are in Rakhine, aren’t worth the cost of destroying your own country in the process? Its just bad policy, and no good for business.

IF ALL ELSE FAILS

“Malaysia is home to the second-largest overseas Burmese population, hosting more than 250,000 Burmese workers as of 2015, according to UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs figures”…

Lets imagine that all of these Burmese workers, most of whom are probably decent people, are kicked out of every pro-Rohingya country in the world. I mean just kicked out overnight, without warning and put on planes & boats back to Burma: What would that do to Myanmar’s economy, and how would it affect their policy on the Rohingya?

You see, when anyone instigates Mass Population Displacement (MPD), its no longer a domestic policy issue, because so many other countries have to deal with the fallout: Does Naypyidaw expect Istanbul to keep paying Dhaka to run the refugee camps? (and how much of that money is being looted by Bangladeshi PM, Hasina Wazed, is anyone’s guess). I mean, look: It’s going to get to a point, where the Turks, or anyone, just say: ‘Its more economically viable for us to repatriate / limit Burmese workers, and put a cap on whatever the dollar amount for their overseas remittances may be. Then to keep paying to prolong an undesirable status quo. Now let’s hope it doesn’t come to that, but it’s worth quietly making Myanmar aware of the possibility; if things don’t visibly improve for Rohingya Muslims.

THE RIGHT PLAN

Let’s have another look at the Rohingya elders 12 point plan, and try and reconcile as many of those demands in line with the Chinese proposal:

1. Keep UN Security Force in ARAKAN before Repatriation.

  • We should ask the Rohingya to consider a NAM (Non-Aligned Movement) sourced UN security force in Arakan. Involving the UN in a laissez-faire capacity, will only complicate matters. Thus the peacekeeping force should be assembled from NAM countries (excluding India–which is now in the U.S.-Israeli camp) who’re familiar with the region; to avoid a repeat of the atrocities committed by European UN troops in Somalia, Ivory Coast and Yugoslavia.

NAM Member States make up 88% of  all UN security missions, so I’m sure it will be quite easy to recruit a team that’s acceptable to everyone:

Image result for un peacekeepers indonesia

Image result for UN peacekeeping malaysia

NAM put forwards its principled position on the UN peacekeeping operations. All mandated peacekeeping tasks must be accompanied by a parallel, comprehensive and inclusive peace process and based on national ownership and the consent and adherence of the concerned parties.

NAM stresses that such operations are not a substitute for addressing the root causes of conflict, among them poverty, hunger, inequality, human rights violations and mismanagement of natural resources.

NAM also emphasizes the importance of respecting States’ sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence, reiterating that the principles of peacekeeping – consent of the parties, impartiality and the non-use of force expect in self-defence – are critical to the success of peace operations.

NAM believes that increasing demand for peacekeeping missions and the multidimensional nature of contemporary operations call for a more robust partnership between the United Nations and regional organizations.

Venezuela, speaking on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, UN Security Council Meeting, 29th August 2017

3. Bangladesh, UN EU, UNHCR, OIC, HRW, USA, UK, Other International Communities and Rohingya Representative must involve in Repatriation Agreement and process.

  • With regards to the international community playing a role in the Repatriation Agreement process; that’s a perfectly reasonable request: The only point I’d like the allies to raise with the Rohingya people; is whether it’d be possible to increase the number of Rohingya representatives on the committee, but streamline the committee itself? So that we have more Rohingya people on board, as well as the UNHR, OIC and AESAN representatives. This would make a for neater, safer, fairer and more focused repatriation process.

NEW PROPOSED PLAN: THE 11-POINT CHINA-MYANMAR-ROHINGYA PEACE PLAN

  1. Have a ceasefire: Restore order and stability, so Rohingya people can live in peace.

  2. All parties should encourage and support Myanmar and Bangladesh to strengthen Rohingya refugee exchanges. Find a way to solve this issue through consultation on the basis of equality.

  3. Economic development of Rakhine State.

  4. Keep NAM sourced UN Security Force in ARAKAN before Repatriation.

  5. Restore nationality with Rohingya Ethnicity.

  6. To ensure freedom of religion and movement.

  7. ASEAN, NAM, OIC and Rohingya Representatives must be involved in the Repatriation Agreement process.

  8. Rehabilitate Rohingya people in their own Land, Village and House, Compound.

  9. Compensate Rohingya losses and return confiscated Lands.

  10. No accusation on any Rohingya about past event.

  11. Take action against criminals in Court.

RESTORING ROHINGYA RIGHTS AND THE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD

Now in order to ensure that countries who don’t have Asia’s best interests at heart, are kept at bay: Everyone must uphold their end of the deal. No one should try and be too clever, or snake around the agreed-upon terms. No one should say one thing, and do another.

So far, there are faint signs of progress here. And by progress I mean that China has convinced the politicians in Myanmar of the regional benefits of the New Silk Road: China will begin work on the Kyaukphyu deep sea port on Arakan coast. Aung San Suu Kyi is also on board with the project and finally appears willing to act on the Rohingya crisis, so she’s our ally now… apparently.

Lets not let Myanmar become a proxy battleground for Judeo-Western warmongers and the Rothschild central bank. China is working to a schedule. Burma’s bleak days of ethno-sectarian strife & Shabbos Goydom are at an end. God willing, the future will be better for Rohingya people. One way or another: Asia is moving forward at a pace; Myanmar must move with it, or risk being left behind forever.


ADDITIONAL READING


Saffron Terror: Israel’s monks target Rohingya Muslims to Destabilize China

IsraelMyanmarFlag_jpg

By Kashif Ahmed,  First Published on February 6th, 2014

Myanmar–Burma, Arakan region, Rakhine state, 15th January 2014: Buddhist monks massacred 35 Rohingya Muslims, 30 of whom were local girls aged between 12-17.There were over 800,000 Muslims living in Rakhine, which has now been turned into a lawless Suddetenland cut off from the rest of the country.

State sanctioned lynch mobs have martyred many Muslims since 2012. Approximately 200,000 Burmese Muslims and some Christians have been made refugees with an untold number arrested / disappeared.

Myanmar’s Muslims made refugees after months of attacks and harassment.

But all this didn’t happen in a vacuum, Myanmar–Burma is a front line state in the U.S.-Israeli ‘String of Pearls’ containment programme against China. And every Saffron terror attack; be it an RSS false flag in India, BSS violence in Sri Lanka or a 969 murder spree in Burma, is tied into this plan.

Now these so-called monks have nothing to do with Buddhism but use it as a convenient cover for their crimes. They are U.S-Israeli backed mercenaries ordered to destabilize the region and help maintain Zionist Jewry’s weakening grip on the East.

THE ROTHSCHILD AGENDA

The Jewish community is the only minority with equal rights in Myanmar. Whilst Christians and Muslims have had their citizenship revoked by the regime, Jewish mayors were appointed to govern Rangoon and Pathein.

The Jewish community is the only minority with equal rights in Myanmar. Whilst Christians and Muslims have had their citizenship revoked by the regime, Jewish mayors were appointed to govern Rangoon and Pathein.

Rothschild wants total control over the Burmese economy in a bid to dominate China, Pakistan and Iran.

Israel plans to capture sea-lanes in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea. Their long-term naval colonisation scheme involves mining these routes with unmanned submarines (i.e. drone-subs) that are being built by the ‘Israeli Administration for the Development of Weapons and Technological Infrastructure’ (Mafat) and expected to roll out by 2020.

The Ports battle: China-Pakistan are developing Gwader as China and India exchange move and counter-move to secure the Bay of Bengal and Asia Pacific.

The Ports battle: China-Pakistan are developing Gwader as China and India exchange move and counter-move to secure the Bay of Bengal and Asia Pacific.
July 25th, 2006: U.S. Lieutenant Colonel Christopher J Pehrson, wrote a report entitled ‘String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power Across the Asian Littoral’ in which he stated that “…China’s rising geopolitical influence…from the South China Sea through the Strait of Malacca, across the Indian Ocean, and on to the Arabian Gulf…” would challenge U.S. hegemony.

Zionist Jew Robert Kagen, laid the ideological groundwork for a deadly embrace / containment strategy almost a decade earlier: China would be made to fall in line with the Rothschild-Jewish system, as regional regimes were ‘democratised’ through a series of colour revolutions and economic takeovers.

Either the Chinaman would have to accept life as a dandified slave under Zionism or face the wrath of Rothschild instigated proxy wars in every country he dare invest in:

“By embracing the Chinese, by exporting our Western ways, we will bring them down. By helping them expand their economy, we will exacerbate the contradictions of “authoritarian capitalism” and force their resolution in favour of more democratic forms”.

Robert Kagan ‘What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment’, The Weekly Standard, 20th January 1997.

When President Thein Sein oversaw the U.S.-Israeli approved ‘democratisation’ of Burma in March 2011, Buddhist death squads of the 969 were given the all clear to go on the rampage against minorities and Chinese interests in the country.

Partners in Crime: Rothschild stooge Aung San Suu Kyi and IMF lackey President Thein Sein.
President Sein, using the cover of ethnic violence, quietly passed a law to give the Rothschild central bank autonomy from the Burmese Finance Ministry and asked the IMF to improve the Kyat-to-Dollar exchange rate on the international market.

Mr. Sein is all too aware of his role as a shabbos goy and is turning tricks for Rothschild in the vain hope that they’ll let him hold office for a while longer. Before the big push to bring Aung San Suu Kyi or another like-minded lackey to power.

THE SINO-INDIAN BATTLE FOR BURMA

The Indian regime collaborated with the CIA and Tibetan terrorists against China in the failed ‘Circus, Barnum and Bailey’ operations (1958-74). China and India went to war in 1962 in which the People’s Liberation Army ended the Indian occupation of Aksai Chin in Jammu and Kashmir.

Anti-Islamic, Saffron terror has long been part of U.S.-Israeli policy against the Global South and Rothschild’s deputy in the region is the Indian regime.

Ergo, an Indian-Burmese alliance is, in reality, an Israeli-U.S.-Burmese alliance, which puts Burma-Myanmar in Rothschild’s anti-China camp by default.

Both China and India have a vested interest in Burma, with both in competition to develop ports and forward operation bases over there.

“Rakhine state is the site of an expanding Chinese presence, including a port and the terminal of a trans Sino-Myanmar pipeline and logistical network leading to China’s Yunnan province.”

Tony Cartalucci, Global Research, March 23rd, 2013

The 969 monks raided Sitwee in 2012 and sabotaged China’s Sitwee to Yangon motorway in a series of a coordinated terror attacks on Chinese projects in the region.

Every 969 assault saw Muslim casualties and Chinese material losses. Indian projects were untouched upon the orders of the 969’s Zionist overlords.

Rohingya Muslims, Karen Christians and other minorities were just unfortunate enough to find themselves caught in a protracted, proxy terror attack by the U.S.-Israel-India against China.

WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS?

969’s ringleader, Ashin Wirathu, is a common criminal harboured by the Masoeyein Monastery, Mandalay. Mr. Wirahtu has been given a free hand to incite murder since ‘democratisation’.

The 969 are part and parcel of the Rothschild terror campaign fronted by British-Israeli stooge Aung San Suu Kyi, pro-Israeli NGO The International Crisis Group (owned by Zionist Jew George Soros) and a variety of other propaganda outlets including the Soros controlled ‘Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB)’ and National Endowment for Democracy.

These mad monks are Israel’s foot soldiers in a Buddhist disguise whilst Aung San Suu Kyi is the ethnic face of Jewish extremism.

“Many monks are influenced by Wirathu’s hateful messages, and are directly involved in genocidal campaigns against the minority Muslim population in Myanmar. They are also supported by government agencies at all levels – from local to central”.

Dr. Habib Siddiqui, Rohingya Muslim political leader, Press TV, Dec 28th 2013

Now its’ worth noting that whilst these bloodthirsty, Zionist-backed lunatics roamed the streets with machetes, it was the monks of Shan State and others who sheltered their Muslim compatriots:

“I know more than a 1,000 Muslims fleeing from their attackers received sanctuary inside our monasteries. Until a few months ago, Buddhists and Muslims lived peacefully together”.

Udamme Thara, Zay Yar Bun Monastery, Meikhtila, ‘South China Morning Post’, 9th June 2013.

“Many monks and monasteries have provided aid and sanctuary to thousands of displaced Muslims. We are mobilising monks to aid our Muslim brothers.”

Ashin Issariya, Dhammepiye Temple and Meditation Centre, Yangon.